holochain myetherwallet with ledger nano s 2021 calendar

CLICK HERE
 
 

 
https://myetherwallet.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bitcoin Address Lookup, Checker and Scam Reports ...
 
holochain myetherwallet with ledger nano s 2021 calendar

Bitcoin Address Lookup, Checker and Scam ReportsCryptocurrency NEWS Archive – Forex Trading SignalsMEW Generate Unilimited Free BitcoinBlockchain Explorer CoinMarketCap
 
According to the website of the operation, each wallet is divided into 2 or more All these transactions and records are stored on the Bitcoin ledger.

 
Bitcoin Address Lookup, Checker and Scam Reports
 
Blockchain Explorer CoinMarketCapBitcoin Address Lookup, Checker and Scam Reports ...Cryptocurrency NEWS ArchiveBITHONEY.io Generate Unilimited Free Bitcoin 2020
PDV will also allow uncollateralized loans on their dLoan platform, and also on platforms like Aave and Compound. The browser uses encryption all the time and the power of blockchain to keep private keys safe. Browser will offer a more robust and innovative type of blockchain storage and caching that is much faster than VPN or TOR. It will allow surfing. Decentr uses Coinbase API to optimise integrated implementation of the user layer and Blockchain as a Service BaaS to allow users to leverage cloud-based solutions to build, host and use their own blockchain apps. Implements a system of layered security protocols based on a radically-new software architecture that combines Elliptic Curve Cryptography ECC 4 and Sobol sequencing with a n-dimensional chain as part of AI-enhanced , platform-wide community consensus mechanism — a mechanism that assigns mutually agreed value to data and user security protocol upgrades further encouraging enhanced data integrity by deploying a Delegated Proof of Stake DPoS protocol. The Brave browser was launched in and in 8 years has reached over 12 million monthly active users , accented by as many as 4. Listed on CoinGecko and Coinmarketcap. Listed on Delta and Blockfolio apps. A unit of conversion between fiat entering and exiting the Decentr ecosystem. A way to capture the value of user data and combines the activity of every participant of the platform performing payment dPay , or lending and borrowing dLend , i. Method of payment in the Decentr ecosystem. CryptoDaku AMA coming up. Mining Algorithm: Scrypt with RandomSpike. This huge supply insures that NENG is suitable for retail transactions and daily use. The inflation schedule of NengEnglandcoin is actually identical to that of Litecoin. Bitcoin and Litecoin are already proven to be great long term store of value. The Litecoin-like NENG inflation schedule will make NewEnglandcoin ideal for long term investment appreciation as the supply is limited and capped at a fixed number Bitcoin Fork - Suitable for Home Hobbyists NewEnglandcoin core wallet continues to maintain version tag of "Satoshi v0. NewEnglandcoin is very suitable as lite version of bitcoin for educational purpose on desktop mining, full node running and bitcoin programming using bitcoin-json APIs. Users can easily set up full node for mining at Home PC or Mac using our dedicated cheetah software. Research on the first forked 50 blocks on v1. NENG v1. There is no boss on NewEnglandcoin. Nobody nor the dev owns NENG. We know a coin is worth nothing if there is no backing from community. Therefore, we as dev do not intend to make decision on this coin solely by ourselves. It is our expectation that NewEnglandcoin community will make majority of decisions on direction of this coin from now on. We as dev merely view our-self as coin creater and technical support of this coin while providing NENG a permanent home at ShorelineCrypto Exchange. Then follow Below Steps to qualify for the Bounty: 1 Required: submit your own designed NENG logo picture in gif, png jpg or any other common graphic file format into DISCORD "bounty-submission" board 2 Optional: submit a second graphic for logo or any other marketing purposes into "bounty-submission" board. Please limit your submission to no more than two total. Delete any wrongly submitted or undesired graphics in the board. Further more, even for mining pools, small mining pool will generate better performance than big NENG mining pool because of new algo v1. The set up configuration of NENG for scrypt pool mining is same as a typical normal scrypt coin. In other word, DynDiff on Scrypt algo is backward compatible with Scrypt algo. However, this spike difficulty like a roadblock that makes big ASIC mining less profitable. No restriction or limit on deposit or withdraw. Fees are paid only on buyer side. Mining fees are appointed by each coin blockchain. This is what NANO has been up to lately. I don't think I lie if I say it has been quite an amazing year! See you soon and happy new year! Something nice is coming soon that I have been working on for a while, stay tuned.. December Travala partners with Booking. A Nano building competition for everyone! Steps towards adoption! July Nanocurrency proudly presents Nano specific community awards! Community Spotlight: Nano-Faucet. Price and Libra posts are shit boring, so let's focus on a technical topic for a change. Let me start by presenting a few of the upcoming Bitcoin consensus changes. Schnorr The sexy new signing algo. Advantages We have a simpler proof of the security of Schnorr than the current ECDSA: a general heuristic is that a simpler proof is better since simpler proofs have less complexity for vulnerabilities to hide in. In practice most cryptographers would consider these roughly equivalent in security. Linear signatures. This lets you do some operations on signatures which include making it possible for a n-of-n signing group to construct a single pubkey and signature, as well as providing secret communications channels i. As a completely new signing scheme we can optimize signatures and public keys a little more than the existing ECDSA Bitcoin signatures, to help reduce resource usage. For instance an SECPK1 point requires bits to store, which is typically stored as one byte for the "extra" 1 bit and 32 bytes as the remaining bits, but this extra bit is really the "sign" of the point positive or negative and we can enforce certain restrictions like "always use positive points", and a scalar which produces a negative point can be "negated" to produce a positive point, letting us cut out one entire byte from precious onchain space. Disadvantages The Schnorr patent strongly discouraged development of Schnorr signatures. For this reason there are still details that hadn't been hammered out. The bip-schnorr proposal by Pieter hammers down some details, but there are still some concerns about multisignature and more complex usages below that are still being investigated. MuSig A provably-secure way for a group of n participants to form an aggregate pubkey and signature. Creating their group pubkey does not require their coordination other than getting individual pubkeys from each participant, but creating their signature does require all participants to be online near-simultaneously. Advantages Provably-secure. We already knew from Schnorr's work that Schnorr signatures allow multiparticipant signing, but his original proposal was actually insecure this is part of the disadvantage caused by Schnorr patenting the signature scheme, nobody bothered to correct his multiparticipant signing procedure because why give free work for him? We can create a group pubkey without telling the group we made such; we only need to get their individual pubkeys. This can be useful in some protocols, e. Creates just a single signature and pubkey, greatly reducing the space needed onchain for n-of-n groups. No actual change in consensus needed, other than supporting Schnorr signatures as a consensus signing scheme. Disadvantages Only n-of-n; m-of-n requires verifiable secret sharing in addition to MuSig. In particular, for m-of-n we require that the participants also cooperate while generating the group pubkey unlike the n-of-n case where we can just get published pubkeys, the m-of-n case requires that we perform some cooperative calculation to generate the private key shares for each participant. Unlike separate-signatures-and-pubkeys multisig i. Instead, participants have to cooperatively generate a temporary signing nonce and then generate the signature. This is what forces all participants to be online at the time of generating the signature. This can be mitigated somewhat since you can pass around partial signatures, so once you have gotten the agreed-upon nonce and then created your partial signature, you can then go offline. This might not be a particularly big disadvantage but existing protocols might require an extra message turnaround in order to handle the multiple-rounds nature of MuSig. This can be simulated somewhat with current Bitcoin by using a separate transaction that pays from a pubkey or m-of-n or n-of-n multisig to a SCRIPT, which you only publish if you want to take the SCRIPT path, but Taproot optimizes this by letting you dispense with that separate transaction. Some protocols that want to have some privacy CoinSwap in particular will need to have some way to hide the SCRIPT path and just use a pubkey or m-of-n or n-of-n in the "best case", and Taproot allows the "worst case" SCRIPT path to be somewhat more optimized if we need to take that branch. The exact proposed mechanism in bip-taproot by Pieter allows another version number to be embedded. A new "script version" can completely drop the current stack-based SCRIPT language and replace it with a completely new language, for example. However, other schemes might want to use pay-to-contract because of the space savings of the ability to embed a message commitment without adding more space beyond the pubkey , so care must be taken to ensure that such schemes using pay-to-contract do not conflict with Taproot itself. MAST Encode each possible branch of a Bitcoin contract separately, and only require revelation of the exact branch taken, without revealing any of the other branches. If the contract has only one branch then MAST does not add more overhead. Advantages Privacy; branches not taken are not revealed, potentially hiding the possible participation of some entity with known pubkey if that entity ends up not signing for that branch. Can be used to emulate m-of-n while using only n-of-n MuSigs remember, n-of-n MuSig can be set up by knowing only the pubkeys of all participants, but m-of-n requires that the participants split up an n-of-n MuSig key into m shares, and each participant has to remember its own share which can be difficult for hardware wallets to safely do. You need to have m participants online at signing time. This has the side effect of not revealing participants who didn't sign. Disadvantages Requires O log n data to be revealed for n branches. This mildly leaks some information: if you see q data to prove the MAST, then the number of branches is between 2 q-1 and 2 q. Here is the main info as an image updated v1. But as we've seen with Mount Gox and more recently BitGrail, exchanges can fail and lose your funds. For me personally, I didn't want all my coins strewn across numerous apps and wallets - I'd rather have them all in one place. You may wish to use something like Keepass or 7zip for the encryption process. Each coin has "Easy" and "Secure" instructions. These are usually the official sites, or sites that are endorsed by the applicable subreddit's moderatospokesperson. Exceptions include very well known sites such as MyEtherWallet. NB: Whenever any instruction says " offline ", you should interpret that as: " Offline, on an air-gapped computer such as an old unused laptop which never sees an online connection ", especially if you're following the Secure instructions rather than Easy ones. A LOT of hard work has gone into this. If you find this useful, feel free to donate at the current crypto locations if you'd prefer to donate with another coin, just PM me, and I'll create one with my own instructions! Why is EOS Different? EOS is a community-driven distributed blockchain, that allows the development and execution of industrial-scale decentralized applications dApps. Therefore, EOS intention is to become a blockchain dApp platform that can securely and smoothly scale to thousands of transactions per second, all while providing an accessible experience to app developers, entrepreneurs, and users. They aim to provide a complete operating system for decentralized applications by providing services like user authentication, cloud storage, and server hosting. The EOS. IO open-source code was developed and it is currently updated by Block. EOS is the first Blockchain that focuses on building a dApps platform by using the delegated proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. Each account is linked to a public key, and this public key is in turn linked to a private key. A private key can be used to generate an associated public key, but not vice versa. A private key and its associated public key make up a key pair These keys ensure that only you can access and perform actions with your account. Your public key is visible by everyone using the network. Your private key, however, will never be shown. You must store your private keys in a safe location as they should not be shared with anyone unless you want your EOS to be stolen! Wallets store key pairs that are used to sign transactions. In theory this provides free transactions on the network, the number of transactions that any user gets in a 24 hour window is determined by the amount of stake especially in CPU that any given account maintains. This guide then provides a brief overview of the account creation process of some of those account types that allow for easy no friction EOS mainnet onboarding and in most cases, the provision of more than enough resources to be able to utilize the network without having to go through the process of buying, transferring, and staking or renting resources ensuring your account remains operational. What is RAM? Currently DeFi is the fastest growing sector in blockchain, which allows greater inclusion within the financial system even for those who previously could not participate in the global economy. Indeed, to use DeFi products is enough just a smartphone, and the so-called "unbanked", ca now participate without any restrictions. One Medium Block. Did Block. Is Block. Will Block. Is there a graphical wallet that I can use? Which hardware wallet can I use? This week's collection has over paid and premium Android apk files, For your convenience the Apk files have been uploaded into 3 separate selective ZIP files, enjoy! ME — Map with Navigation and Directions v8. Original post by rethink-your-strategy on Bitcointalk. What once was common knowledge, is now gone. You want a quality history lesson? Share this like wildfire. August 15, , AM Preamble I'd like to start off by stating categorically that the cryptography presented by CryptoNote is completely, entirely solid. Monero have had a group of independent mathematicians and cryptographers peer-reviewing the whitepaper their annotations are here , and one of their reviews is here , and this same group of mathematicians and cryptographers is now reviewing the implementation of the cryptography in the Monero codebase. Many well known Bitcoin developers have already had a cursory look through the code to establish its validity. Two other things I should mention. I curse a lot when I'm angry and scams like this make me angry. If you find this information useful, a little donation would go a long way. It builds on some of the Bitcoin founding principles, but it adds to them. There are aspects of it that are truly well thought through and, in a sense, quite revolutionary. CryptoNote claim to have started working on their project years ago after Bitcoin's release, and I do not doubt the validity of this claim The story as Bytecoin and CryptoNote claim it to be is as follows: They developed the code for the principles expressed in their whitepaper, and in April, , they released Bytecoin. All of the copyright messages in Bytecoin's code are "copyright the CryptoNote Developers", so clearly they are one and the same as the Bytecoin developers. In December , they released their CryptoNote v1 whitepaper. In September , they released their CryptoNote v2 whitepaper. In November , the first piece of the Bytecoin code was first pushed to Github by "amjuarez", with a "Copyright c amjuarez" copyright notice. This was changed to "Copyright c Antonio Juarez" on March 3rd, By this juncture only the crypto libraries had been pushed up to github. Then, on March 4th, , "amjuarez" pushed the rest of the code up to github , with the README strangely referring to "cybernote", even though the code referred to "Cryptonote". The copyrights all pointed to "the Cryptonote developers", and the "Antonio Juarez" copyright and license file was removed. Within a few days, "DStrange" stumbled across the bytecoin. Immediate Red Flags The first thing that is a red flag in all of this is that nobody, and I mean no-fucking-body, is a known entity. If they're pseudonyms, then say so. If they're real names, then who the fuck are they??? Cryptographers, mathematicians, and computer scientists are well known - they have published papers or at least have commented on articles of interest. Many of them have their own github repos and Twitter feeds, and are a presence in the cryptocurrency community. The other immediate red flag is that nobody, and I mean no-fucking-body, had heard of Bytecoin. Those that had heard of it thought it was the crummy SHA Bitcoin clone that was a flop in the market. Bytecoin's claim that it had existed "on the deep web" for 2 years was not well received, because not a single vendor, user, miner, drug addict, drug seller, porn broker, fake ID card manufacturer, student who bought a fake ID card to get into bars, libertarian, libertard, cryptographer, Tor developer, Freenet developer, i2p developer, pedophile, or anyone else that is a known person - even just known on the Internet - had ever encountered "Bytecoin" on Tor. Indisputable Facts Before I start with some conjecture and educated guesswork, I'd like to focus on an indisputable fact that obliterates any trust in both Bytecoin's and CryptoNote's bullshit story. Note, again, that I do not doubt the efficacy of the mathematics and cryptography behind CryptoNote, nor do I think there are backdoors in the code. What I do know for a fact is that the people behind CryptoNote and Bytecoin have actively deceived the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency community, and that makes them untrustworthy now and in the future. If you believe in the fundamentals in CryptoNote, then you need simply use a CryptoNote-derived cryptocurrency that is demonstrably independent of CryptoNote and Bytecoin's influence. Don't worry, I go into this a little later. So as discussed, there were these two whitepapers that I linked to earlier. Just in case they try remove them, here is the v1 whitepaper and the v2 whitepaper mirrored on Archive. Here's where it gets interesting. When we inspect this file in Adobe Acrobat we get a little more information on the signature. Notice the bit that says "Signing time is from the clock on the signer's computer"? CryptoNote chose not do this. But we have no reason to doubt the time on the signature, right guys? See these references from the v1 whitepaper footnotes? Those two also appear in the v2 whitepaper th. Neither of those two footnotes refer to anything in the main body of the v1 whitepaper's text, they're non-existent in the v2 whitepaper they are used in text. May 5, The footnote is referencing a post that did not exist until then. What sort of fucking fools do they take us for? A little bit of extra digging validates this further. And yet both of these documents were then modified in the past when they were signed. Final confirmation that these creation dates are correct are revealed those XMP properties. Now pdfTeX is a very old piece of software that isn't updated very often, so the minor version the. This version of pdfTeX was only pushed to the pdfTeX source repository on February 14, , although it was included in a very early version of TeX Live version The earliest mentions on the Internet of this version of pdfTeX are in two Stack Exchange comments that confirm its general availability at the end of May here and here. The conclusion we draw from this is that the CryptoNote developers, as clever as they were, intentionally deceived everyone into believing that the CryptoNote whitepapers were signed in and , when the reality is that the v2 whitepaper was created in March, , and the v1 whitepaper haphazardly created a month later by stripping bits out of the v2 whitepaper accidentally leaving dead footnotes in. Why would they create this fake v2 whitepaper in the first place? Why not just create a v1 whitepaper, or not even version it at all? What they didn't expect is the market to say "no thank you" to their premine scam. I know it exists, because "AtomicDoge" referred to it as saying that one of the Bytecoin developers is a professor at Princeton. I called them out on it , and within a week the page had disappeared. Fucking cowards. That was the event that triggered my desire to dig deeper and uncover the fuckery. As I discovered more and more oddities, fake accounts, trolling, and outright falsehoods, I wondered how deep the rabbit hole went. My starting point was DStrange. This is the account on Bitcointalk that "discovered" Bytecoin accidentally a mere 6 days after the first working iteration of the code was pushed to Github, purely by chance when mining a nearly dead currency on a tiny and virtually unheard of mining pool. He has subsequently appointed himself the representative of Bytecoin, or something similar. The whole thing is so badly scripted it's worse than a Spanish soap opera I can't tell who Mr. Gonzales, the chief surgeon, is going to fuck next. At the same time as DStrange made his "fuck me accidental discovery", another Bitcointalk account flared up to also "accidentally discover this weird thing that has randomly been discovered": Rias. If you look at their early posts side by side you can even see the clustering: Rias , DStrange. At any rate, the DStrange account "discovering" Bytecoin is beyond hilarious , especially with the Rias account chiming in to make the discovery seem natural. Knowing what we unmistakably do about the fake CryptoNote PDF dates lets us see this in a whole new light. Of course, as has been pointed out before, the Bytecoin website did not exist in its "discovered" form until sometime between November 13, when it was last captured as this random picture of a college girl and February 25, when it suddenly had the website on it as "discovered". It's certainly conceivable that the whitepaper was put together by him and other members of the Stanford Bitcoin Group, and the timeline fits, given that the group only formed around March More info on the people in the group can be found on their site, and determining if they played a role is something you can do in your own time. Batshit Insane The Bytecoin guys revel in creating and using sockpuppet accounts. Remember that conversation where "Rias" asked who would put v1 on a whitepaper with no v2 out, and AlexGR said "a forward looking individual"? The conversation took place on May 30, and was repeated verbatim by shill accounts on Reddit on August 4 also, screenshot in case they take it down. Literally the only thing these sockpuppets do, day in and day out, is make the Bytecoin sub-reddit look like it's trafficked, and spew angry bullshit all over the Monero sub-reddit. Fucking batshit insane - who the fuck has time for that? Clearly they're pissy that nobody has fallen for their scam. Because that's not fucking obvious at all. And let's not forget that most recently the sockpuppets claimed that multi-sig is "a new revolutionary technology, it was discovered a short time ago and Bytecoin already implemented it". What the actual fuck. If you think that's bad, you're missing out on the best part of all: the Bytecoin shills claim that Bytecoin is actually Satoshi Nakamoto's work. I'm not fucking kidding you. For your viewing pleasure I present to you Not only is this insulting as fuck to Satoshi Nakamoto, but it's insulting as fuck to our intelligence. And yet the fun doesn't stop there, folks! Of course! How could we have missed it! The clues were there all along! Fuck me on a pogostick, this is the sort of stuff that results in people getting committed to the loony bin. One last thing: without doing too much language analysis which is mostly supposition and bullshit , it's easy to see common grammar and spelling fuck ups. My personal favorite is the "Is it true? You can see it in the Bytecoin thread asking if it's Satoshi's second project, in the Monero thread asking if the Monero devs use a botnet to fake demand, and in the Dashcoin thread confirming the donation address for a coin whose only claim is that they copy Bytecoin perfectly, what the fuck do they need donations for?? Layer After Layer One of the things that happened soon after the Bytecoin "big reveal" was a string of forks popping up. The first was Bitmonero on April Fantomcoin was launched May 6. Quazarcoin was launched May 8. HoneyPenny was announced on April 21, although only launched as Boolberry on May MonetaVerde as launched June I have no idea why they did this, maybe it's to try and lend credence to their bullshit story oh hey, look how old Bytecoin is, it's even on Sourceforge! Coincidentally, and completely unrelated hurr durr , Quazarcoin , Fantomcoin , and Monetaverde are all also on Sourceforge. This gives us a frame of reference and a common link between them - it's quite clear that at least these three are run by the same team as CryptoNote. There is further anecdotal evidence that can be gathered by looking at the shill posts in the threads especially the way the Moneteverda shills praise merge mining , in a way that is nearly fucking indistinguishable from the Bytecoin praise for multi-sig technology. QuazarCoin is a special case and deserves a little attention. Let's start with OracionSeis, who launched it. He's well known on Bitcointalk for selling in-game currencies. On May 7, just when Monero was being taken back by the community see below , OracionSeis out of the blue decided to take it overelaunch it himself. This included a now-defunct website at monero. The community pushed back hard, true to form, with hard-hitting statements such as "To reiterate, this is not the original devs, and thus not a relaunch. OP, fuck you for trying this. This should warrant a ban. OracionSeis caved and decided to rename it to QuazarCoin , which launched on May 8. To recap: bought account, launched by trying to "relaunch" Monero, got fucked up, renamed it to QuazarCoin. Clearly and undeniably goes in our pile of fuckface coins. The other three are a little more interesting. Given the shill posts in the duckNote thread I'm going to flag it as possibly-controlled-by-the-fuckface-brigade. This is an interesting one. This was "pre-announced" on April 21, although it was only released with the genesis block on May This puts it fourth in line, after Fantomcoin and Quazarcoin, although fucktarded proponents of the shittily-named currency insist that it was launched on April 21 because of a pre-announcement. Fucking rejects from the Pool of Stupidity, some of them. At any rate, "cryptozoidberg" is the prolific coder that churned out a Keccak-derived PoW Wild Keccak in a month, and then proceeded to add completely fucking retarded features like address aliasing that requires you to mine a block to get an address lulz and will never cause any issues when "google" or "obama" or "zuckerberg" want their alias back. This aliasing system is another atypical one-trick-pony that the CryptoNote developers push out and claim is monumental and historical and amazing. There's also the matter of cryptozoidberg's nickname. Now this may be a little bit of conjecture, yo, but the same comment appears twice in the "epee" contributed library, once in the levin signature , and again in the portable storage signature. The contexts are so disconnected and different that it would be a fucking stretch to imagine that the same person did not write both of these. We can also rule out this being a Bytecoin-specific change, as the "Bender's nightmare" comments exist in the original epee library on github w which is completely unused anywhere on the planet except in Bytecoin, most unusual for a library that has any usefulness, and was first committed to github on February 9, We know from the copyright that Andrey N. Sabelnikov is the epee author, and we can say with reasonable certainty that he was involved in Bytecoin's creation and is the dev behind Boolberry. Sabelnikov is quite famous - he wrote the Kelihos botnet code and worked at two Russian security firms, Microsoft took him to court for his involvement accusing him of operating the botnet as well , and then settled with him out of court on the basis of him not running the botnet but just having written the code. Kelihos is a botnet that pumped out online pharmacy spam you know the fucking annoying "Y-ou Ne3D Vi-4Gra!? Regardless of BBR's claim to have "fixed" CryptoNote's privacy and the fake fight on Bitcointalk between the "Bytecoin devs" and cryptozoidberg , it's clear that the link between them is not transparent. BBR is either the brainchild of a spam botnet author that worked on Bytecoin, or it's the CryptoNote developers trying to have one currency distanced from the rest so that they have a claim for legitimacy. I think it's the second one, and don't want to enter into a fucking debate about it. Make up your own mind. Which brings us to the oddest story of the bunch: Bitmonero. He made a fatal error, though: he thought just like all the other cryptocurrencies that being "the dev" made him infallible. Ya know what happened? He tried to force his ideas, the community politely said "fuck you", and Bitmonero was forked into Monero, which is leading the pack of CryptoNote-based coins today. Nobody working behind these cryptocurrencies is known in the cryptocurrency community, and that alone should be a big fucking red flag. Monero is streets ahead, partly because of the way they're developing the currency, but mostly because the "core devs" or whatever they're called are made up of reasonably well-known people. That there are a bunch of them 6 or 7? They're so angry they waste hours and hours with their Reddit accounts trawling the Monero sub-reddit, for what? Nobody has fallen for their scam, and after my revelation today nobody fucking will. Transparency wins, everything else is bullshit. If they couldn't have the leading CryptoNote coin Not only did they setup a thread with " A complete forking guide to create your own CryptoNote currency ", but they even have a dedicated website with a fuckton of JavaScript. Unfortunately this plan hasn't worked for them, because they forgot that nobody gives a fuck, and everyone is going to carry on forking Bitcoin-based coins because of the massive infrastructure and code etc. We saw earlier that Dashcoin is probably another CryptoNote developer driven coin. However, this entire group is not really important enough, nor do they have enough potential, for me to give a single fuck, so make up your own mind. New CryptoNote coins that pop up should be regarded with the utmost caution, given the bullshit capabilities that we've already seen. I know that my previous section had a lot of conjecture in it, and there's been some insinuation that I'm throwing everyone under the bus because I'm raging against the machine. That's not my style. I'm more of a Katy Perry fan There were some extra links I uncovered during my research, and I lacked the time to add it to this post. Thankfully a little bit of sleep and a can of Monster later have given me the a chance to add this. If we look at the whois and DNS records for bytecoin. All of the CN domains use WhoisGuard or similar private registration services. Every single domain, without exception, uses Zoho for email. The only outlier is bitmonero. The instinct may be to disregard this as a fucking convenient coincidence. But it isn't: Zoho used to be a distant second go Google Apps, but has since fallen hopelessly behind. Everyone uses Google Apps or they just use mail forwarding or whatever. With the rest of the points as well, as far-fetched as the link may seem, it's the combination that is unusual and a dead giveaway of the common thread. Just to demonstrate that I'm not "blowing shit out of proportion" I went and checked the records for a handful of coins launched over the past few months to see what they use. Everyone uses different service providers and different platforms. And none of them use Zoho. My next check was to inspect the web page source code for these sites to find a further link. If you take a look at the main CSS file linked in the source code for monetaverde. It isn't a very popular CSS reset snippet, it got dumped in a couple of gists on Github, and translated and re-published in an article on a Russian website in November, let's not go full-blown conspiritard and assume this links "cryptozoidberg" back to this, he's culpable enough on his own. It's unusual to the point of being fucking impossible for one site to be using this, let alone a whole string of supposedly unrelated sites. You've got to ask yourself a simple question: at what point does the combination of all of these fucking coincidental, completely unusual elements stop being coincidence and start becoming evidence of a real, tenable link? Is it possible that bytecoin. And is it also possible that monetaverde. It's not a conspiracy, it's not a coincidence, it's just another piece of evidence that all of these were spewed out by the same fucking people. The Conclusion of the Matter Don't take the last section as any sort of push for Monero. I think it's got potential certainly much more than the other retarded "anonymous" coins that "developers" are popping out like street children from a cheap ho , and I hold a bit of XMR for shits and giggles, so take that tacit endorsement with a pinch of fucking salt. CryptoNote's whitepaper dates were purposely falsified to back up this bullshit claim. Both Bytecoin and CryptoNote have perpetuated this scam by making up fake website data and all sorts. They further perpetuate it using shill accounts, most notably "DStrange" and "Rias" among others. They launched a series of cryptocurrencies that should be avoided at all cost: Fantomcoin, Quazarcoin, and Monetaverde. They are likely behind duckNote and Boolberry, but fuck it, it's on your head if you want to deal with scam artists and botnet creators. They developed amazing technology, and had a pretty decent implementation. They fucked themselves over by being fucking greedy, being utterly retarded, being batshit insane, and trying to create legitimacy where there was none. They lost the minute the community took Monero away from them, and no amount of damage control will save them from their own stupidity. I expect there to be a fuck-ton of shills posting in this thread and possibly a few genuine supporters who don't know any better. If you want to discuss or clarify something, cool, let's do that. If you want to have a protracted debate about my conjecture, then fuck off, it's called conjecture for a reason you ignoramus. I don't really give a flying fuck if I got it right or wrong, you're old and ugly enough to make up your own mind. Bytecoin, Fantomcoin, Quazarcoin, Monetaverde, Dashcoin are all from the same people and should be avoided like the fucking black plague. Monero would have been fucking dodgy, but the community saved it. Make your own mind up about shit and demand that known people are involved and that there is fucking transparency. End transmission. Just a reminder that if you found this information useful, a little donation would go a long way. Period: It includes techniques for composition, data flow, dependency management and more points, 6 comments WalmartLabs open sources Electrode, a React-based application platform that powers Walmart. It can be used as controlled or uncontrolled component 64 points, 2 comments React DOM Confetti - a react component to trigger confetti explosions on state changes 61 points, 8 comments points, 17 submissions: acemarke React Release Roadmap: Teach a man to program, frustrate him for a lifetime. Good programmers write code that humans can understand. His recent series on React and GraphQL was 73 videos long a day well over 15 hours of material. Better, simpler, faster, smaller points, 16 comments MobX 5 has been released! His channel deserves more views guys by Tayk5 points, 35 comments The subtle but hilarious humour used in the official React tutorial by kyenzie points, 26 comments I've made a react. Redux or MobX? Is their anything you would have done differently to speed up the process looking back? We are currently getting too much traffic! You are just able to use this generator for the next minutes! ClaimBitcoin is the Bitcoin generator that everyone has been waiting for. Currently it is the only working Bitcoin generator out there, and at the moment it can generate anywhere from 0. It uses peer-to-peer encryption to generate the required amount. It represents a transaction verifier by creating a transaction block, where each block links to the previous block, making a chain. We have launched Free Bitcoin Generator on an online server instead create software or apps. That is the right way to use Bitcoin Generator, and you can start it in a single click. It is fast loaded, secure with elegantly designed, and easy to use. You will get these all features in this online generator. Generate Now. It works with the official servers of Bitcoin Cryptocurrency, and we have Bitcoin has high chances to reach a new record price this year and in the next five. Many investors predict that Bitcoin price will reach even 25, usd in If you want to access free bitcoin generator, click on the generator, add your bitcoin generator wallet address and choose how much bitcoin you want to generate. The mining process If you want to learn more about how we manage to make a profit from this click on the 'Learn more' button below. Learn more » Generate 0. To generate 0. For this you will need to complete one survey. Generate » Generate 0. Just follow Bitcoin Generator no fee generate free Bitcoins. With this free Bitcoin generator you can claim up to 0. Bitcoin is expensive and h Stop the free bitcoin mining and Originally Uploaded by: AndroGalaxy. Generated with BBoe 's Subreddit Stats.